During the week of 21 June to 24 June, the landscape of reality TV
shifted and rather than the usual bimbos running around in bikinis engaging in pointless conversations, SBS aired a rather political (i.e, not suitable for slutty watchers), arguably controversial and definitely passion stirring four episodes about six Australians embarking on a journey in the footsteps desperate fleeing refugees. The ‘twist’ with this show is that these participants have strong prejudicial views on refugees that represents a big proportion, in fact, I’d say majority of people in Australia. If you don’t believe me, just tune into any popular talk back radio stations or watch any popular news affairs show.
Unfortunately, I didn’t get a chance to watch the other 3 episodes but I did get the gist of it from reviews and feedback afterwards. As expected, the participants’ views about refugees did change after their experiences with the horrors that real refugees went through BUT they all held the belief that Australia should STILL determine HOW migrants enter the country. This is a good proposition.
Yet, a recent personal example shows how immigration laws are actually ineffective in practice. Imagine that you are successful business owner with 200 employees and an annual profit of $500,000 who wish to go overseas for a year to study English and get to know a foreign culture. You submit all the correct forms and went through all the legal interviews only be told by Australian representatives that you are too rich to enter the country. They question your motive in leaving your business for a year to study in Australia.
But of course, they have found you out. Your real motive is to leave your young wife, 2 kids, 2 cars, 3 houses, and 2 factories so you can over stay your precious Aussie visa and struggle as a non- English speaking migrant seeking permanent residency. You are from Vietnam and thus carry a stigma. Oh well. You can always apply to go to the ‘poorer, less advanced, less enlightened’ country like Singapore. They only accept people with money and a proven track record at business success.
During this whole time, more boats kept on arriving along with trashy Lady Gaga. Resentment and anger from Australians against people smuggling kept on mounting. So how do we solve this problem?
Remove the financial incentive for people smugglers and divert that income to Australia by guaranteeing those who are desperate to flee their countries a place in asylum detention centres (and air plane tickets) at a price of $20,000. You think that is too cheap? How about $50,000? We shall call this class of seekers ‘economic refugees’.
These people are moderately financially successful in their own countries but political and social circumstances prevent them from applying for a visa through the normal channel. Their situations are desperate enough for them to spend their whole life savings on a dangerous trip to another country. So let’s remove their risks for a price. We can always refuse their applications if they do not fit the criteria.
It also means we also have to change our viewpoint about these refugees. Every time I talk to Australians on the boat people issue, they always have the same conclusion: ‘these asylum seekers are rich’ in a tone of voice that dripped with contempt until I ask them if it’s better to have people with money who can support themselves entering the country or to receive poor refugees that the state has to care for. By creating a class of economic refugees, Australia can attract more hard-working, ambitious and more importantly not too needy migrants. In short, they attract more people like me.
You see, we have invested too much time and money into our new lives to waste it. We put up with a bit more hardship and sacrifice a few things that white bread Aussies take for granted. When classmates or colleagues invite me to go out, they would most likely receive an allowance from their parents, while I would be spending my government allowance – well, the left over amounts after I have helped to pay our household bills. As soon as I started working, my Mum drummed into me the importance of saving up for a house (for both of us to live together) while most other Aussie parents would be happy that their kids are showing ‘independence’ by saving up for their first car.
Indeed, after we purchased our first house, and I as further make progress in my career, the financial responsibilities kept on growing. While my contemporaries may be happily furnishing their own apartments, I was busy furnishing the house for my Mum and I. Yes, it is always, ‘my Mum and I’. There is no clear distinction because in the end, everything benefits both of us equally.
Hold your pity for me because the lifestyle I described is very typical of a migrant family anywhere in the world. Being the first family in a foreign country, we do not have the luxury of having an established wealth and I mean ‘wealth’ as in a modicum level of comfort that allows independence from government financial assistance. So we cannot abandon our parents to retirement villages because our parents can’t afford it anyway. The least we can do is to help our parents obtain public housing from the government but a higher call of duty requires that you help them with a house, a car and a decent living.
Understand that doing the above will make you fall behind your peers. You will have to sit and listen politely while they rave on about their latest exotic overseas adventures for the 5th year in a row while you know that taking regular holidays mean less help for your parents.
While the average person get marry and have children with a little bit of effort, if you do the same, a little bit more effort is required. For a start, you can count on zero support from your parents. In fact, you may have to assist them. Fancy dresses, hair, make up, and accessories for them cost money. If you have chosen a partner who is also an economic refugee, you can also count on zero assistance from him and his family. So you swallow the bitterness as you hear stories about other women’s husbands and their families giving the bride jewellery, money for honeymoon OR at the VERY least a bed as a gift.
But bury the bitterness so you can unleash it on the unsuspecting world (well on the 10 innocent people reading this blog) because those things are not as important as moving towards your own goals. The mate that you chose is simply a useful partner. He has the skills that you need. He is in the same class as you so there little ego clash. More importantly, you both share a common purpose. Perhaps that is all a successful marriage needs to stay long term. (There was one chance for real happiness but the risk was too great and the cost was too high to bear).
Do the maths and you will realise that the struggle for financial freedom is never fair. You accept the fact and as a result become more driven. Petty jealousies and grand passions both do not move you to change your course. How can it? Everything you have now and in the future depends on you.
However, I know that if I lose it all, I can build up from scratch again. Fear of financial losses and poverty do not fill me. I am familiar with it. I will be broken but I can push on to eat instant noodles, wear second hand clothing and travel far to sit quietly in a library (do they still exist?) for amusement. Nothing soft ever comes out of difficult situations except weariness. Hence, when I leave this earth, I want the following statement engraved on my tombstone: ‘HERE LIES DIANA LE. FREE AT LAST’.
My story is not told to evoke your compassion but to illustrate my point that being an economic refugee is NOT a crime. Australia needs more greedy but hard working people. We are a rich country. We don’t HAVE to share the wealth. We simply have to INCREASE it.
We could also encourage a brain wave by attracting wealthy, talented workers from overseas but the infrastructure and incentives required would be costlier (but still need to be pursued) than setting up the framework necessary to take in the right type of refugees. I understand the difficulties of implementing such a programme may mean it will never become a reality, but it is simply an idea.
However, this blog, like the mini-series documentary, is not meant to solve political issue nor sway you to become soft so we can all hold hands and live without borders (wouldn’t that be grand though?). It is meant change your perception on the issue. Understand that not all refugees are poor and needy and see that as a good thing. See also that people smugglers are not so evil. Similar to the ring leaders of the Bali Nine group who are now awaiting execution, they are simply looking to make money. Thus, in the pursuit of money for Australia, maybe we can solve this refugee problem after all.
Like this:
Be the first to like this post.